The GovernmentтАЩs case against legalizing same-sex marriage in India is weak. HereтАЩs why.
A critique of the Centre’s arguments against same-sex marriage.
Hues may vary but humanity does not | ро╡рогрпНрогроЩрпНроХро│рпН ро╡рпЗро▒рпНро▒рпБроорпИрокрпН рокроЯрпНроЯро╛ро▓рпН тАУ роЕродро┐ро▓рпН рооро╛ройрпБроЯро░рпН ро╡рпЗро▒рпНро▒рпБроорпИ роЗро▓рпНро▓рпИ
A critique of the Centre’s arguments against same-sex marriage.
Surabhi Shukla’s analysis of the 6-9-18 Supreme Court verdict and legal reasoning of the case.
Twenty students and alumni of the Indian Institutes of Technology have filed a petition against the Koushal verdict on Section 377.
The Right to Privacy judgements most certainly include the right to oneтАЩs self-identified gender identity as upheld in NALSA v. Union of India.
Yesterday, the Supreme Court gave its judgment in a case…
The Right to Privacy┬аjudgment [PDF┬аlink here] earlier today in no…
Ritesh Rajani and Sourav Mandal discuss the legal aspects of leading queer lives in India.
Online survey on Sec 377 and well-being for an IRB-approved student thesis.
Asmita Sarkar represents LGBTIQ+ issues as a candidate for student elections at Jadavpur University, Kolkata, West Bengal.
Akkai Padmashali & Ors. vs. Union of India argue that Sec 377 violates the rights of transgender persons as set out in the NALSA verdict.