SC 2018 Adverse reactions
This is a collection of some of adverse reactions to the Section 377 verdict announced on 6 September 2018 by the Supreme Court. Please let us know if we have missed any.
- Primitive vision
- ‘Step towards self-destruction’: Far-right comes out against Supreme Court’s Section 377 verdict
- Subramanian Swamy calls homosexuality a genetic disorder that gives rise to HIV
- Sex with animals a crime, is SC interfering with fundamental rights? Subramanian Swamy on Section 377
- Same sex marriage not compatible with norms of nature, we don’t support it,’ says RSS
- Section 377 verdict updates: RSS says homosexuality not crime, but needs social and psychological solutions
- RSS on Section 377 verdict: Gay sex not a crime but is unnatural
- No crime, but gay sex not normal, says RSS
- SC hasn’t done anything great, gays should stop playing victim, says Abhijit Iyer-Mitra
- BJP’s Amit Malviya had tweeted against scrapping of Section 377; raised questions on inheritance, adoption laws for homosexuals
- Muslim groups in Kerala come out against Section 377 order
- Section 377: Muslim organisations decry ‘degenerate’ verdict
- ‘Islam forbids homosexuality’: Deoband slams SC 377 verdict
- Gay sex decriminalised: Clerics protest order, hint at moving court
- Section 377 verdict: Few media groups accuse SC of ‘egregious excess’, Urdu newspapers underplay judgment
- Church voices ‘same sex union’ fears
- TN Pastor Nabbed for Sloganeering Against Homosexuality in Court
- A Bengali Daily Published A Really Irresponsible Article On Homosexuality On Its Front Page
- Cubbon Park walkers file plaint against homosexuals
- Section 377: Gay sex is legal in India and tweet
Kamaal R Khan - Child porn weighed on my mind, says Supreme Court judge who upheld Section 377 in 2013