Legal Reasoning: Navtej Singh Johar and Ors. v. Union of India Writ Petition Criminal (No.) 76/2016
Surabhi Shukla’s analysis of the 6-9-18 Supreme Court verdict and legal reasoning of the case.
Hues may vary but humanity does not | ро╡рогрпНрогроЩрпНроХро│рпН ро╡рпЗро▒рпНро▒рпБроорпИрокрпН рокроЯрпНроЯро╛ро▓рпН тАУ роЕродро┐ро▓рпН рооро╛ройрпБроЯро░рпН ро╡рпЗро▒рпНро▒рпБроорпИ роЗро▓рпНро▓рпИ
Surabhi Shukla’s analysis of the 6-9-18 Supreme Court verdict and legal reasoning of the case.
Based on a qualitative study of school experiences of young queer people in Delhi, Surabhi Shukla has developed a website with online resources and a model ‘Sexual Rights and Anti- Discrimination Policy’ for schools in India.
Surabhi Shukla lists salient features and some concerns that Shashi Tharoor’s non-discrimination bill poses to the LGBT community in India